D. Salinger moon whenever you are a beneficial “bored stiff white pet” appears, moves more, and you will hits his left-hand
You might say, up coming, the storyline was Friend’s, while we find him for the first time in every his heartache of heart trying to preserve and you can 41
/. ” Although trend is obvious: unsentimentalized small minutes regarding significant lighting or epiphany; carefully engraved vignettes and therefore show the latest “spiritual system” according to the externals. As the an excellent critic, Seymour try represented through his remarks to your a great amount of Friend’s reports, as well as the substance out of their suggestions are summarized in two concerns he says to Pal he’s going to getting expected while the an author when he dies: “Had been the majority of your famous people out? Have been your active composing your heart out?” Even when Seymour’s inquiries, such as for instance their poems, may not end up being paraphrased, the guy appears to recommend that belief and feeling -within greatest senses -have to be doing work in great creating; and also for the audience they become those people elusive, indefinable services that are seriously moving and lighting up. A reason out of Seymour as the a physical entity nearly proves Buddy’s undoing. As he goes through a catalogue out of Seymour’s physical features – hair, ears, sight, nose, voice, skin, dresses – he becomes a growing number of invasive and less coherent, in some instances, frequently, painfully near disintegration (eg, the guy announces after a quick passage on Seymour’s ears, “I will bed. . . . Both hands try sweat, the new bowels churning. The brand new Integrated Son is not yourself”). “Seymour: An intro” looks not so much a story just like the an assemblage regarding notes, observations, stories, and you may irrelevancies (“blooming parentheses”), much like Pal’s (otherwise Salinger’s) log, where a story might someday be made. The new Seymour one to emerges is similar to the Seymour i came to know currently; the fresh new procedure was showed, brand new complexities found, however, zero genuinely the size is placed into their portrait.
Buddy will be the very first in order to admit the poems reduce something-much -during the “translation by paraphrase
strengthen their learn to the evasive facts lurking from inside the Seymour’s existence. He seems for the desperate necessity of him or her. The guy raises himself at the start, with many paradox, since the an “ecstatically happier kid”; at the conclusion, when he makes to visit class, he realizes that “no single issue” the guy do was “more important than entering one to awful Area 307.” Given that Seymour once told you, “all the i manage our entire lifestyle was go from you to nothing little bit of Holy Soil to the next.” “Seymour: An intro” could be believed to feel the mode you to definitely hides mode, with all the seeming irrelevancies deliberately made to do a level greater than common illusion of truth – the true truth (a method, by-the-way, quite normal, just like the witness Dostoevski’s “Notes of Underground” or Rilke’s The notebook out-of Malte Laurids Brigge). But, still, there clearly was a lingering doubt regarding author’s manage, any doubt that is quite bolstered by the Buddy’s recurrent similarity in order to Salinger. Throughout the tale, records are produced, such as for example to your really works you to definitely Buddy features composed, one push which character. Certainly Pal’s really works is clearly Brand new Catcher on the Rye, one or two others try “Increase Large new Rooftop Ray, Carpenters” (in which Friend is narrator) and you will “The ultimate Time to possess Bananafish” (and he wasn’t), and still another is actually “Teddy” (Buddy also prices of it). Including info because these while others do not, however, confirm anything, nonetheless manage highly recommend – and simply suggest – you to definitely Salinger is actually discussing, yet not obliquely, his very own loss of manage and you will diffusion away from skill. Salinger’s a lot of time quiet pursuing the look of “Seymour: datingranking.net/japan-cupid-review An intro” into the 1959 are concluded when you look at the 1965 towards the book of some other part about Cup tale, “Hapworth 16, 1924.” So it facts did nothing to guarantees those who expected a beneficial come back to the earlier brilliance out-of Catcher on the Rye. In reality, they tended to enhance people characteristics of one’s later on works hence really subscribers found frustrating- a boring duration, a laughter have a tendency to notice-consciously sweet, good muting out-of story in favor of philosophical asides. But in spite 42
この記事へのコメントはありません。